PDA

View Full Version : EPISODE II


pygmypiranha
03-19-2002, 06:07 PM
Hey guys, just found out some interesting tid bits of
information. The Bounty hunter is called Jabo (sp?) Fett, the father of
young Boba Fett. Boba Fett will be appearing in Episode II as a 11 year
old. Also, the lightsaber colors in the film are the usual colors red,
green, and blue...EXCEPT Samuel L. Jackson's character. Jackson asked
Lucas if he could possibly have a purple colored lightsaber and
apparently from what I have seen in the trailers (him holding a purple
lightsaber) Lucas agreed. Apprently Jackson's favorite color is purple.
Another tid bit that probably is most facinating to just myself is this film
will not be shot in celluloid, but is being shot digitally. This is
the first motion picture to be shot completely digital. Sony and
panasonic spent years making the camera's for the movie. Lucas had asked for
them for Episode I, but they were not completed in time.

Nachofunk
03-20-2002, 03:32 PM
I watched Pulp Fiction last night. Samuel L. Jackson kicks
major ass.
"Get my wallet out of the bag"
"Which one is it?"
"The one that says 'Bad Mother Fuckin' Jedi"
Hell's yeah!!!

Pixie
03-21-2002, 05:09 PM
Hi guys I thought you might be interested in this article I
found supposedly the author saw a rough cut of the film in a secret
hotel meeting , the circumstances were all very mysterious. Anyway the
article seemed like the real thing to me but I'll let you judge for
yourselves.
www.aintitcoolnews.com/display.cgi?id=11796 (http://www.aintitcoolnews.com/display.cgi?id=11796)

pygmypiranha
03-21-2002, 08:50 PM
Interesting article. Perhaps he may have seen the film or
even parts of it. Either way, I would have to agree that this film
will be far superior to the Phantom Menace. DIE JAR JAR DIE!!!

FDM
03-21-2002, 09:43 PM
Whenever people defend this character, they always say he's
comic relief. But, take Thenardier from Les Mis, he is comic relief at
times, too... but he effects the story, and is an integral part of it.
Jar Jar sort of effects the story at the beginning, but his whole race
could have been easily eliminated without changeing much at all. I
even find his scenes, and many with the Gundan so disjarring from the
story, that it seems like they just shouldn't be there (true the Ewoks were
almost the same way, but that one that dies screaming takes enough of
the cute-factor out of it to make it work... maybe just one Gundan
getting his head blown off would've made it work for me). I have noticed
in modern film that there are a many characters for comic relief that
don't change anything... and are there merely for the purpose of stupid
laughs. Steve Buscemi in Con Air and in Armageddon... No real purpose,
but his characters are so interesting that I honestly become mad that
the writers just use them as a comedic device. Well, that's enough rant
for me... hopefully Episode II won't be plagued by the same
bullshit.

pygmypiranha
03-25-2002, 12:24 AM
>>(just a warning...swearing is found in the
following email. If you
are
>>easily offended, then fu-...uh, disregard this email...)
>>
>>Anyway, the debate:
>>
>>There are those who claim that Titanic was the movie of the
century.
>>Others claim it was Star Wars. What do you think?
>>
>>STAR WARS vs TITANIC.
>>
>>The Titanic might have been big, but the Death Star was a lot
bigger.
>>
>>The Titanic might have been fast, but the Millennium Falcon was
incredibly
>>faster.
>>
>>Titanic lasted almost four hours; Star Wars is over 12 hours
long so
far
>>and it's still exciting.
>>
>>Star Wars has action figures that are way cooler. If a kid
watches
titanic
>>he bores himself to tears; if a kid watches Star Wars he opens
himself up
>>to technology.
>>
>>Yoda would have used the force to lift the Titanic out of the
water.
>>
>>Leia is a princess, senator, freedom fighter and potential
Jedi; Rose
is a
>>clueless broad and a slut.
>>
>>The Ewoks throw better parties than any "first class"
passengers on
deck.
>>Intergalactic drunks are a whole lot drunker and meaner than
the
pithy
>>drunks in third class.
>>
>>If he was flying towards the Titanic, Wedge wouldn't be able to
say
"Look
>>the size of that thing" without peeing his pants with
laughter.
>>
>>It's a lot more frightening to be chased around by a maniac
@#%$
>>in a black cape, wielding a laser sword in a Tie-Fighter than
by a
stupid
>>rich-boy dressed in smoking, wielding a @#%$ shitty gun and on
foot.
>>
>>Titanic is "equalitarian" because it treats poor
people as
sympathetic;
>>Stat Wars is "equalitarian" because its admirals are
spring-eyed
>>amphibians and no one makes a fuss.
>>
>>The spring-eyed amphibian admirals DO NOT lose their ships
against a
>>@#%$ piece of ice while traveling at less than 100 mph.
>>
>>We know Cal is bad because he mistreats the poor and treats his
girlfriend
>>like a piece of @#%$; Darth Vader however is a real son of a
bitch
because
>>he strangles people and blows up planets like that because he
feels
like
>>it!!!
>>
>>Yes, Leonardo Di CRAPio can dance, but.. can he pilot an
X-Wing? Move
>>things with his thoughts? No @#%$ way!
>>
>>People don't lose their lives tring to re-enact scenes from
Star Wars
on
>>ship's sterns.
>>
>>Rose faces icy water to rescue her boyfriend; Leia faces Jabba
the
Hutt.
>>
>>On the titanic there were only enough life boats for half the
crew
>>(poor bastards); on Star there are always enough escape pods
(first
>>world).
>>
>>D o you know what the Empire does to people who proclaim
themselves.....
>>"King of the world"? THEY @#%$ THEM BUT GOOD!!!
>>
>>If Luke had been hand-cuffed in the ship's cellars, he would
have
used the
>>Force to get the key.
>>
>>"I'd rather be his little whore than your wife"
doesn't quite have
the
>>same punch as "I's rather kiss a Wookie".
>>
>>Han Solo is frozen in carbonite and turned into an ornament.
Leonardo Di
>>CRAPio just freezes and sinks like a stone.
>>
>>Han Solo would have dodged the iceberg while laughing himself
silly.
>>
>>Everyone knew the @#%$ ship was going to sink, but who could
have
>>expected... "Luke... I AM YOUR FATHER!"?
>>
>>And despite all that, there are still some idiots who dare
claim that
>>Titanic was the movie of the century!!!!!

Nachofunk
04-15-2002, 03:08 PM
The previous post has been deemed to large by the Phil Post
Monitoring Association.

viking
04-15-2002, 10:37 PM
he couldn't get us to read it in the Email he sent us so
now he posts it here! lol

pygmypiranha
04-19-2002, 07:23 AM
damn straight. lol

Katt
04-27-2002, 01:47 AM
I can remember when I went to see "Titanic" with
a few of my friends. While they were sobbing because Jack died, I was
trying to stifle my laughter because they were crying over such a stupid
stupid movie. They thought I was sobbing. That is so funny. The only
good thing about that movie I can think of is it's great for doing your
own version of Mystery Science Theater 3000 with. hehehe

Nachofunk
04-29-2002, 03:40 PM
and it's got B(.)(.)BIES!!!!

pygmypiranha
04-29-2002, 11:33 PM
BOOBIES!!!!